Constitution overshadowed by inhumane shadows of humanity
Awaz E Bihar••0 views•7 min read
Syed Maqsood President, Rashtriya Muslim Morcha, New Delhi. Currently residing in Zaheerabad Mobile: 9440836492 The Constitution of India was presented for approval in the Parliament House on November 26, 1949. It was approved, but its opposition began within four days. It was supposed to come into effect across the country on January 26, 1950. Criticism of the Constitution began even before it came into effect. This Constitution could not gain general acceptance. There were several reasons for the opposition. Who suffered and why such a thing was done, all this is being presented.
History of Opposition to the Constitution: A. The Constitution of India was presented for approval in the Parliament on November 26, 1949, and was approved. Criticisms of the Constitution began within four days. The second group of the RSS, 'Golwalkar', wrote an editorial in the RSS mouthpiece 'Organizer', which was published in the November 30, 1949 issue. Golwalkar writes, "Our Constitution is a cumbersome collection of articles from various Western constitutions. There is nothing in it that can be called our own. What are the guiding principles in it? What is our national mission and what is the key importance in our life?" After that, he advocates for the Manusmriti, writing, "That scripture is the most venerable to our Hindu nation after the Vedas. And it is the foundation of our ancient journalism, rituals, thought, and action." The opposition to the Constitution did not end with just one statement; their continuous efforts are still ongoing. And they are trying to prove it right. Their efforts to sway public opinion can be appreciated. They are also benefiting from it. Meanwhile, the opposition is also intensifying. Let's see what happens next.
B. Within 100 days of the Constitution coming into effect, in April 1950, the reservation was challenged. The Salem Brahmana Seva Sangam, a Brahmin organization, approached the court and the President of India, demanding that the reservation be abolished, as it was against the fundamental rights of citizens. Getting a job, education, etc. are the fundamental rights of every citizen of India. But due to this reservation, a Brahmin was being deprived of a job. Kaitastha, the then President of India, Rajendra Prasad, silently supported it, resulting in the completion of the action within just three months. On July 11, 1950, the court ruled in favor of the Brahmins. The great leader of Tamil Nadu, E.V. Ramaswami, the founder of the anti-Brahmin movement, launched a movement against it. As a result, the then Prime Minister Pandit Nehru and the then Home Minister Sardar Patel, in consultation with Babasaheb Ambedkar, who was the Law Minister, included the reservation in the fundamental rights of the Constitution. This was the first amendment to the Constitution, and thus, the reservation became a part of the fundamental rights, and the issue was permanently resolved.
C. The RSS, which is the representative organization of all Brahmins in India, has been brainwashing Brahmins, regardless of the state or party they belong to. For 52 years after independence, it did not hoist the national flag at its headquarters. It considered the three colors of the national flag inauspicious. For 52 years, it only hoisted its own flag. When someone forcibly hoisted the tricolor at their headquarters, an FIR was registered against them. Finally, in 2002, the RSS hoisted the tricolor at its headquarters, changing its policy. And in 2016, they moved from half-pants to full pants, as they were no longer small.
D. The Vajpayee government did a great job. On February 22, 2000, an 11-member Justice V.M. Tarkunde Commission was constituted to review the Constitution. It submitted its report on March 31, 2002, and made several recommendations, such as fundamental rights, constitutional powers, parliamentary and judicial matters, and center-state relations. The then President of India, Venkat Raman, rejected it. Manyawar Kanshi Ram, the supremo of the BSP, turned it into a public movement, and there was strong opposition. At that time, Kanshi Ram said, "There is nothing wrong with the Constitution. The problem lies in the intentions and policies of those who implement it." He quoted Babasaheb Ambedkar's speech, which he had delivered while presenting the Constitution to the Parliament on November 26, 1949, and expressed some concerns. "The Constitution can be good or bad, depending on how it is implemented. If those who work under the Constitution are not good, it can produce bad results. On the other hand, even a bad Constitution can produce good results if it is implemented well." Thus, the issue of reviewing the Constitution ended.
E. On August 9, 2018, the Constitution of India was burned on Parliament Street in Delhi. The party responsible is called 'Aarakshan Virodhi Party (AVP)' and the activists of Azad Sena carried out this act. Legal action was taken, but nothing has been done in the case so far. The implication is clear - who was behind it.
F. To abolish the rights of workers, changes were made to the labor laws, and the fundamental rights of workers were abolished. After 1991, the Manmohan government implemented LPG (Liberalization, Privatization, Globalization), abolishing reservations.
G. On November 17, 2025, PM Modi, while delivering the Ramnath Goenka Memorial Lecture, said, "We will change the education policy of Lord Macaulay introduced in 1853 in the coming days." The implication is clear - Shudras will be deprived of education. Earlier, they did not have the right to education. Only children of high castes could receive education in gurukuls. It was a crime for Shudras to receive education. The Congress and BJP governments have made their education policies, which have resulted in children going to school but being deprived of education. There is a conspiracy to deprive Shudras of education.
Constitution of India vs. Manusmriti: What is the Constitution of India? What is Manusmriti? By comparing both, we will find out what Manusmriti teaches - whose rights to violate, whose freedom to snatch, whom to enslave, whom to oppress, and what kind of education it provides. Does it benefit humanity or not? And what kind of assistance is being provided to the proponents of Manusmriti to establish and maintain the varna system?
A brief overview of the Constitution of India: The Preamble to the Constitution states that justice, equality, social freedom, brotherhood, and fraternity are its foundation stones. The Constitution was built on these principles. It seems that 25 chapters, 15 schedules, and 395 articles were created in 1949 to explain it.
A brief overview of Manusmriti: According to Babasaheb Ambedkar, "Hinduism does not differentiate between religion and law. Both are the same." (Vol. 3, Chapter 1, Philosophy of Hindu Religion, Page 95, Babasaheb's speeches and writings) About Hindu philosophy, Babasaheb said, "If we analyze Hindu philosophy from the perspective of justice, it will be clear that Hinduism is an enemy of equality, hates freedom, and opposes brotherhood." (Vol. 3, Chapter 1, Philosophy of Hindu Religion, Page 66, Babasaheb's speeches and writings) This is Manusmriti, Brahmin Dharma, or Hindu Dharma. The book that explains it is called Manusmriti. What does it say? Some examples are presented here.
First example: Chapter 1, verses 87-91, state that the entire world is managed by four varnas - Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra - like the four parts of the body - mouth, arms, stomach, and feet. And their duties are separate. 88. For Brahmins, six duties are prescribed: studying the Vedas, teaching the Vedas, performing yajna, getting yajna performed, giving dan (charity), and receiving dan. 89. For Kshatriyas, five duties are prescribed: protecting the subjects, giving dan, performing yajna, studying the Vedas (but not teaching), and being detached from worldly pleasures. 90. For Vaishyas, seven duties are prescribed: protecting the four varnas, giving dan, performing yajna, studying the Vedas, trading, lending money, and farming. 91. For Shudras, only one duty is prescribed: serving the above three varnas with devotion. (Manusmriti, Urdu translation by Kripa Ram Sharma Chakralawi, published by Vedic Dharma Press, Delhi, Page 16-17)
These five verses prove that the duty of a Brahmin is to perform intellectual work, of a Kshatriya to wage war, of a Vaishya to trade and earn wealth, and of a Shudra to serve all the above. This means that a Shudra is deprived of knowledge, power, government, and wealth. He is born only for slavery. This is the irrational and inhuman philosophy created by Brahma himself.
